The reason that @Undisciplined wrote "narrative violation" is because they guessed I was going to present a point that goes against the masses.

The dictionary was written by the masses as language grew. The masses believe that something is imaginary if it does not exist.

However, something only doesn't exist if you can't see it, hear it etc.

Take the tree that falls in the woods when no one is there to hear it fall - does it make a noise? What may seem imaginary to some, is very real to others.

I hope that makes sense - I am in the middle of a meeting whilst typing!