I thought you believe in rule of law, why would you want me to get run over and not arrested if that's the case?

Have you been blocking traffic recently? 

I hope you get run over next time 

Bell_curve

They are two entirely different concept. 
https://vannormanlaw.com/rule-law-vs-rule-law/

I am not confusing civil disobedience with rioting, I am telling you in most democratic countries have its fair share of literal riot and made progress.

The idea that public disobedience would mean no rule of law, is funny, because it's often a topic of debate that civil disobedience can lead to correction to injustice in the society, including unjust law eg discrimination.  (probably too in-depth for you though, given you can't distinguish between the two)

kingzing131

alter_native

What the Campus Protesters and Their Critics Get Right and Wrong

Undisciplined

Rule of law is rule by law. 

You are confusing rule by law with rule by men or tyrants. 

You are also confusing civil disobedience with rioting. Riots are not civil. 

1965 watts riots were an example of social decay not civil disobedience 

The French Revolution was a disaster because of the guillotine. 

Social movements don’t require chopping heads or arson or theft 
