lol then they wouldn't be the bad guys would they? ;)
The only government that is doing that right now is El Salvador.
The international banker tribe does not exercise power mindlessly, it can change rulers on a whim or dispose those whom it cannot change quite easily.
The only exceptions either have nukes or backing from a power with nukes.
THere is a reason that taking a loan from the "IMF" comes with a bunch of riders which translates to pretty much selling out your country
My point was, when playing against the government I'd much rather play "whose money is harder?" than "who's capable of more violence?".
reply
I see your point but those without power do not have the choice against those WITH power.
The entire history of Central Banking, from the Napoleanic wars is rife with this.
In the end, it comes to Hard Money + Hard Violence overcoming Corrupted Money + Overwhelming Violence.
It should be interesting :)
reply
126 sats \ 1 reply \ @om 1 Aug 2022
I think you're overly pessimistic on this. First, cryptography is power. No amount of cannons and horses could help Napoleon to calculate a discrete logarithm :) Performance of people without cryptography is not indicative of future performance of people with cryptography.
Second, the very existence of bonds and the very fact that we can own stocks are the spoils of past peoples' victories against the State. You don't focus on those because they happened before the Napoleonic Wars.
Third, the world outside US/Europe has alternative payment systems, for example hawala, that the governments weren't able to suppress so they gave up.
reply
You need to learn true History, Napolean was not the bad guy.
It is realism. Naivete is no escape,as the truckers in canada amply displayed. :)
reply