that doesnt mean bitcoin is the only money.. It isnt.. Forms of money will always come around.. Economy is not a closed system, FIAT may die and will appear again and again. Debt is a tool If bitcoin is the only money, debt will still exist.
Debt is a tool
No, it is slavery.
reply
I think you are confusing usury with debt. debt is a tool that alows progress. Usury linked to FIAT is slavery since the one who controls the print, controls the money. But its a common misconception.
reply
debt is a tool that alows progress.
PEAK IDIOCY
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @fm 2 May
you cant really discuss any point without vomiting do you ?
Someone must have hurt you really bad.. Feel bad for you
reply
Yes, statists and shitcoiners like you are pissing me off.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @fm 2 May
Vomit all you want.. I neither one or another... And you saying it, wont change much. If you repeat the same gibberish to everyone, it kind of lose meaning.. just saying Being pissed everyday is kinf of bad for you isnt it?
reply
oh you are... I was watching you all along. go back to your state cage
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @fm 2 May
for a while i found you funny.. Now i just find it sad.. guess you are only happy with circle jerking
You are always the slave of your lenders. No exception. That's why they create that pseudo-money called fiat, to enslave you. That's why bankers own almost everything, because people is so stupid to submit to their issued debt.
Debt is never the solution. Never.
And it is not progress. It is retardation.
reply
Its only slavery if usury is in the picture. Lending money is not always bad.. You have plenty examples where you can use bitcoin as collateral and its still debt. i think most mix the current debt model with debt. Without debt as tool only monopolies could produce. Its important to give small producers a tool to produce, sell, and pay back. If the money emission is not crooked, debt allows markets to figth monopolies
reply
Usury and debt is the same thing, because you submit your freedom and sovereign in exchange of debt. Those who own are slaves of their debt, always. Lending money is always bad, because it means you choose the easy path which is using the resources of those that want to enslave you, so almost all your work is for them in the end. Instead, an intelligent person will always choose to start small and not own anything to anybody, so he remains all the time sovereign.
Monopolies is what banksters are, because they own almost everything, through debt.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @fm 2 May
i dont agree. Lending can be much more than usury.. Usury is apllied over lending but not the same. If your family let you some money to kickstart something, are they evil? Lending does not have to be evil. You just enclosed on the FIAT usury system. Without means to access debt, you have only monopolies. You cant start small as you said. Competence would be so reduced that we would only change masters.
reply
If my family lends me something then I work for my family, not for me.
So you think that not having debt will create monopolies, but it is in the contrary. Who owns CocaCola and Pepsi? The same banks. Go up one level. You'll see the real monopolies. Blackrock, Vanguard, and all the funds owns almost everything. And those funds are owned by the same giant banks. That's the real monopoly. You are blind thinking you can choose between CocaCola and Pepsi, when in reality the owners are the same!!!
And you can apply this to every company in SP500, and beyond. Every business that works through debt is owned by the same. The true real monopoly.
Just wake up.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @fm 2 May
and you think if we take FIAT away we will have a full on communist repartment of the remaining wheath ? Because monopolies wont go away just because FIAT is..