pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 16 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 May 2024 \ parent \ on: Bitcoin paradigm shift thought experiment bitcoin
That's very much the scenario I'm imagining.
The reason I'm concerned about it is that it creates two adoption hurdles for us: 1) getting people to use bitcoin at all and 2) getting them to use dirty bitcoin.
"Dirty bitcoin" is nothing but a human construct that creates problems where there are none; there is no "dirty" or "clean" bitcoin, there's simply bitcoin.
They [the gov] isn't burning or destroying money or other assets they seize, things that could be labeled as "dirty" just as well, no, they use those assets to improve the police, for example, by acquiring more and better police cars, uniforms, guns, training, et cetera---and there's nothing wrong with that.
Why should it be different with bitcoin?
They [the gov] isn't burning any seized ("dirty") bitcoin either, no, they auction it FFS, they profit off of it, FFS.
Hypocrisy is running wild on the upper levels.
reply
I get all that. My concern is essentially that they can create a barrier to adoption by incentivizing merchants to only accept "clean" bitcoin. If adoption develops along those lines, it'll be a huge setback for "freedom money".
reply
People need to start being rational and think for themselves, not simply do as told by big daddy gov.
reply
Sure, but they're not going to.
reply
One of the reasons why I'm an outspoken misanthrope.
reply
What outcome are you hoping for out of your misanthropy? Serious question. It's not clear to me what perpetual scolding is good for. Maybe it's fun? Hopefully that's enough for you, because that's all I think you (or anyone) are achieving with that strategy.