pull down to refresh
I don't think it's a matter of responsibility. It's a matter of UX and introducing friction to zapping.
For bitcoin to fundamentally change internet applications, I believe the applications themselves must be not-custodians.
I agree in principle, but in my opinion, LN UX is not yet there yet, to support such a change.
If you want to push this on principle, at the expense of losing a userbase, or having the zap signal be of lower quality, it's your perogative as the site owner.
reply
If you want to push this on principle [...]
I think it may be useful for you to reflect on the word 'want' in that sentence.
reply
I don't think it's a matter of responsibility. It's a matter of UX and introducing friction to zapping.
I think responsibility and friction are intertwined. For me, responsibility implies matters of UX and introductions of friction.
If you want to push this on principle, at the expense of losing a userbase, or having the zap signal be of lower quality, it's your perogative as the site owner.
I agree.
reply
I lack your crystal ball, but I wouldn't be surprised if people don't want to take more responsibility for the funds they use here. Still, we're giving this a shot.