They are officially being prosecuted for knowingly soliciting "illicit money" for their business right?
This is no different from a bank knowingly soliciting "illicit money". Maybe this case really is technology agnostic.
Banks and money changers have been successfully prosecuted for similar offenses in the past without discrediting the whole ecosystem.
Not trying to say the case has merit, just trying to follow their logic.
Forget about the law, the state can interpret anything to its benefit.
reply
That’s absolutely true!
reply
I see your thinking here
reply
So you can go to jail for shitpost now? IMO the whole point of their online rhetoric was to highlight how their tech is oblivious to the source and destination of funds, as you know, a privacy service should be.