pull down to refresh
54 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 26 Apr \ on: Expanded Look at Civil Forfeiture After the Samurai Arrests privacy
How could Samourai Wallet have been "transferring funds on behalf of the public" if they never took custody of user funds?
There is no middleman in a Whirlpool tx.
Funds never leave the user's own wallets. There's no "mixer" repository.
This part of the indictment is a lie.
https://m.stacker.news/28224
I have no reason to doubt ya and idk could it be the hopper that was part of the protocol? I am just trying to think out loud so to speak to come up with the reasoning... if they were operating the BTC hopper on behalf of clients maybe? Its an enormous stretch but that's all I can think of!
reply
If there's something that's secretly operating on the platform, I also don't know, what to say then.
I'm no defender of Samurai
reply
reply
I'll wait sincerely for your input on this .
reply