We've all seen George Carlin's take on the government, right?
And yeah, we've all laughed at it. But much as I love George - and he was hands down my favorite comedian ever -- I think he used the wrong word.
It's not that you shouldn't believe anything the government says. It's that you shouldn't trust the government.
See, a good liar does not actually lie all the time. In fact, a great liar lies as little as possible, not least because the goal isn't "to be a liar," but "to hold power."
Someone who lies 100% of the time is actually, in the end, incredibly trustworthy. If I know you're a liar and I ask you which path I should take, I know to just do the opposite of what you say1.
But a great liar will often tell you the truth. Not necessarily the whole truth, but if the truth is the thing that helps keep them in power, they'll go with it. The truth can (often) be verified, so the more they control you with truth, the more you're likely to eventually stop checking. If I've told you the truth 100 times in a row and you've checked my work each time, you're eventually going to get complacent and just accept that I'm honest.
That's what the government (and also a ton of corporations and religious institutions, not to mention individual con artists, including a lot of online political "influencers") rely on. Then they throw in the half-truths, or bad conclusions drawn from true facts. Poverty, starvation, and debt all exist, so surely their solutions are worthwhile! The lie will be some small assumption or theory or bad data buried in the larger plan, and unravelling it is the trick.
So yeah, I may believe something the government says, or at least be willing to verify and accept it, but that doesn't mean I trust their conclusion or motivation.
(And yeah, in terms of current events, they've clearly made some truthful statements about Samurai. It's possible that all the factually verifiable statements are true. It's their conclusion and the actions that spring from them that's where the dishonestly lies.)

Footnotes

  1. There's an entire logic puzzle genre built around this.
I think the way Carlin said it is fine, but I see how there are different ways to hear it.
When the government puts out a statement, it is propaganda. Whether or not it's factual, the purpose is not to inform, but rather to manipulate.
The point is to wonder why you're being told something, rather than believing it. I don't think the point is to stop believing something just because the government said it.
reply
Yeah, it's less about what George said than the occasionally oversimplification of the idea I see when some folks quote him.
The point is to wonder why you're being told something, rather than believing it.
Yes, this.
reply
It's their conclusion and the actions that spring from them that's where the dishonestly lies.
This is the perfect conclusion that we should get out of all the fuss against government. TBH, I am the same person who does not trust government to be right with its actions but the facts are facts and we should consider them as well.
We need to establish a clear rule if we are against the government or its actions.
reply
Thanks -- glad this mostly made sense (since it was basically a ramble I thought about as I was walking the dog).
reply
No, I must thank you because what I can only listen now is the one side of the coin from everyone. All have been trying to say that there was nothing wrong with Samurai, but you came out and made the other side visible.
reply
gov is a complex org made up of different branches. So it doesn't always need to have a hidden motive.
If a child got hit by a car, you'd expect gov to be aware of it and implement solutions if it happens repeatedly.
reply
reminded me of this German newsreel from June 1944, after Normandy landings, 17 minutes long, with English subtitles:
The only questionable statement is how German army was ready, but even this can be explained away, they did shoot back. Everything else sounds true or at least plausible. Shot down an aircraft, destroyed a few tanks, captured a few soldiers? Guess they did. True but totally irrelevant, no information value. Yet it manages to create a feeling of "we are winning", without telling it directly. Especially if you want to believe it.
reply
Yes, they lie to mislead you. But they are able to sprinkle in the truth at times, so you have some doubts. And these doubts just fester in you!
reply
The government will use the truth or lies depending on which benefits it more, as you say, believing that everything they say is false or a lie does not help since it puts you only in one line of thought and you cannot see the general outlook, it is better to analyze.
reply