Gone is the talk of separating money and state, of a market-based means of exchange, of genuine revolution that would extend from money to the whole of politics the world over. And gone is the talk of changing the operation of money as a means of changing the prospects for freedom itself.
The article starts off well. I thought it was a critique of NGU that culminated in the ETF craze.
Unfortunately, it's not. Rather, it's a puff piece supporting Ver's book from the guy who wrote the forward.
Still, some of the criticism is valid, although not any having to do with block size.
At a minimum, this gives an insight into some criticisms that bitcoin will confront when it becomes more mainstream.