It's never just about carbon. You obviously know that when you mentioned farming which tackles methane.

It IS effective, whether EFFICIENT way to cut down emissions is another question. 

I am also not sure what you mean scale doesn't support the science. 

You don't need hundreds of years of record to know if you have a model of X + Y = Z, which has been verified  with real life live data repeatedly and simulation. 

Do you think we need light years of record to prove gravity exists? 

And we are all bitcoiners here, we are risk averse to protect Bitcoin against any attacks. Somehow we should be open to the idea that we shouldn't wear any seatbelts and just let things be, even if the risk is life threatening globally 

Very good points,

You know what is also being overproduced? Taxes that wont fix a thing and will be abused.
All this science is being used to extract wealth. 
You must be aware that our scales work in a very small time frame that doesn’t support half the “science” they want you to believe.

Taxes and electric conversion are scams.. ending farming and meat also a scam
end programmed obsolescence first,
Go geothermal 
Those are way better solutions that make you Carbon compliant. 



If life matters to you then it is a pollutant in the sense that it's being overproduced as a byproduct.

Objectively speaking, the universe doesn't have pollution nor does life matters.

kingzing131

Oh, that comment is plain ignorant.
Remeber to take your 6th booster buddy 

You are right. 
Maybe humans need to learn how to breath CO2?
We could all win a darwin award. 

Satosora

charts_and_numbers

US per capita CO2 emissions now at 1913 levels

zuspotirko

What i mean is, chemically speaking C02 is not a pollutant. Fact is, if it wasn’t for CO2 life on earth would be very different to the point we are not sure if humans could exist.
