reply on: Stacker Sports- Day 134- Mock Public_N_M_E \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

77 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 18 Apr freebie \ parent \ on: Stacker Sports- Day 134- Mock Public_N_M_E Stacker_Sports

What kind of trading up scenario do you like?

I went to third because that's as high as I could get without trading future picks. I was going to take whichever of Maye or Daniels was still available.

90 sats \ 5 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 18 Apr

I think, with the reality of the QB tax. I don't actually want to trade up to 2/3. Maybe 4/5. But I think it'll cost more than I'd be willing to pay. 11&23 for 4/5 might be what the trade charts say is fine, but really, those teams are going to squeeze us if we want to come up and I'd rather not part with 3 1s for 1 guy. When we could get someone like Penix at 11 and a bluechip defensive player at 23. I think the needs of the team as a whole is more than just a QB. I'm not averse to trading back. Like GR did in his mock, pulling back and getting a fist full of second and thirds is really an interesting prospect.

87 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 18 Apr

I like the trading back approach too, but we’re not quite as QB desperate.

I’ll be really curious to see where Penix goes.

90 sats \ 3 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 18 Apr

I think he gets reached for. It's that 1st round 5th year option benefit. Plus general QB tax.

71 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr

I think so too. There are so many QB needy teams. Why wouldn't one of them trade into the back of the 1st to grab him?

40 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 19 Apr

I think the 49ers might trade back if they can’t get an OLine or DLine stud.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr

Would it have to be an OT or would they consider interior guys with that pick?

I think the stud tackles and d-linemen will be gone.