For Slide 2

#1 Low quality contributions and spam #2 Moderation is required #3 Centralization -> censorship
s/b something more like...
#1 Noise -> Low Effort Posts & Spam #2 Bias -> Group-Think & Required Moderation #3 Censorship -> Conflicts & Governance
As you have it, you kindof have two sortof related things for #1, a stop-gap solution statement as #2, then this wierd arrow that makes #3 different/adhoc compared to the first two.
My point is, you should explicitly call out the problems on the left, and then explain the outcomes/consequences or why they are bad on the right hand side of the arrows.
reply