But you get used to this kind of situation, and the overhead isn't even the real problem. The real issue is that the easiest way to advance in academia is to pay other people to produce papers, on which you, as the grant holder, can put your name.
I don't have much to say about what the internal experience of women is like, but this quote is true enough. It's worth saying, though, that academia is lot like the rest of life in this way -- there's a system of incentives, and an ecosystem to figure out how to maximize, and some people are really good at it.
Just like you might have a friend who had the same amount of money as you but who owns ten rental properties because he figured out this was a good way to use his skills to inhabit the system effectively, certain people really have figured out the points of leverage in academia. They know how to manage a big research group, crank out papers, get grants. Not everyone can do this. Some "normal" academics toil away, trying to do it the "right" way, and usually suffering.
Whatever the system, somebody will figure out an effective way to maximize it, and what they do will often not resemble what you thought the system was supposed to be doing (in this case, educating the public.)
@kepford had a post #500465 about this recently. In a bureaucracy, those who advance the stated goals of the bureaucracy (scholarship and education in this case) eventually lose out to those who advance the bureaucracy itself.
reply
160 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 11 Apr
Whatever the system, somebody will figure out an effective way to maximize it, and what they do will often not resemble what you thought the system was supposed to be doing (in this case, educating the public.)
I haven't made this connection before, but thanks to your comment I see how true this is now: Even gamers suffer from this.
I think this phenomenon is very related to Goodhart's Law:
If you start to measure how many papers are produced to measure education or how many points players made to measure fun, they cease to be good measures.
reply
I think this phenomenon is also very related to Goodhart's Law.
Yes! Good connection. A lot of weird stuff bundled together.
Here's the most ridiculous example I've ever heard of for the sheer mad stupidity of how this works.
reply
Here's the most ridiculous example I've ever heard of for the sheer mad stupidity of how this works.
This reminded me of how I never understood what I read when it was my turn to read out loud in primary school.
I always had to read it again on my own.
reply