pull down to refresh
158 sats \ 3 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 9 Apr \ on: The Same People Who Let Off Epstein Are Now Letting Off Diddy conspiracy
That's an incredibly misleading headline from Kim, seeing as Alexander Acosta was the attorney who covered up for Epstein (and he's no longer in a position to cover up for Diddy, though I'm sure he would if he could and was paid enough).
Williams could have (as the guest notes) done a better job on Maxwell (though she's still going to die in prison), and should have gone after some of the other folks mentioned by the guest (not familiar enough with that case to know the details), but I'm not convinced he's covering things up here yet.
I don't know if I'd say "incredibly misleading", but I do take your point. From the headline, I also assumed it was Acosta.
What struck me as interesting about it (beyond the obvious), was the jurisdictional point about this guy normally working NY cases, when Diddy's activities were primarily LA and Miami.
reply
Yeah, "incredibly" might have been my own overreaction (my initial reaction was anger that Acosta might have been working as prosecutor again, along with surprise I'd missed it). I do think the issue around NY jurisdiction over CA/FL crimes is interesting and one I expect we'll hear a lot more about.
reply
If the Diddy and Epstein situations are related, it would make perfect sense to assign someone with his experience to it.
I'm just not willing to grant these people the benefit of the doubt until we see some heads roll for the Epstein/Maxwell crimes.
reply