pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 7 Apr \ on: Running phoenixd tests lightning
I'm yet to see any complaints about phoenixd. Did they really get it that right from the jump?!
It seems like the downsides are the LSP dependence and the higher fees, but is that all?
reply
Is more like a "LN funding source".
Is not meant to be a LN wallet or LN node. I mean it runs like a LN node in automatic mode, but to interact with it in a proper way you need something like LNbits or BTCpay on top of it.
I think the best use case for it will be as a funding source for LNbits.
reply
reply
It depends on the definition of a lightning node but I'd describe it as a lightning node without routing/liquidity concerns.
Is not meant to be a LN wallet or LN node.
I think it is meant to be like the Phoenix wallet, but can always receive because it's running on a server (and not on a phone).
need something like LNbits or BTCpay on top of it
The same can be said for LND, can't it?
reply
LND doesn't need lnbits or btcpay.
What will be interesting to see if more app devs will build apps that could link a phoenixd backend to it.
For example Alby, Zeus, Bitbanana, Lnbits, Walletano.
reply
reply