Not a bad strategy. I am picking based on weakness of schedule. Trying to pick which teams even if they aren't top teams are playing the weaker teams in the league. I am hopeful that will serve me well until people start racking up strikes, then I will have the best teams in my back pocket for when things get tight. Who knows, could backfire on me.
Seems like a good use of knowing how to spot a weak schedule
reply
Interesting that the survivor pool account doesn't crack the top 100 despite all the zaps.
reply
Probably because it's mostly me and I'm not a trusted individual.
reply
Me too. An another example of where were stand amongst the SN VIPs.
reply
We are the 17th and 19th "most valuable" stackers, according to a new category in "top" that I don't understand.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 6 Apr
I was thinking about the value status and I think we get punished for quantity. Because we make and zap so many comments, many which are just you and I going back and forth or responding to a random reply to a post and zapping it sends down our value rank. It's kind of silly but to maintain the highest value rank I believe you have to engage only with the most popular posts and stackers and in a limited way because every comment or zap that doesn't get engagement from others of high stature knocks you down a peg.
reply
It should improve naturally as more people get involved in the sports conversations.
It also makes sense that we're not being rewarded for joking around about Uranus.
reply