yes, I understood. I was just using it to draw a similarity between the inventive idea of 'satoshi tokens' and ordinal theory, not in the context of fungibility.

lloyddunne

You're reading too much into my text. Whether it's satoshis or bitcoins, that's the fungibility. Doesn't matter if it's 1.0 or 1.0 / 100000000, my point is that Bitcoin itself is already the fungible "token".

Ordinals_Inscriptions_Runes

Ordinal Theory is based on made up bullshit

You're reading too much into my text. Whether it's satoshis or bitcoins, that's the fungibility. Doesn't matter if it's 1.0 or 1.0 / 100000000, my point is that Bitcoin itself is already the fungible "token". 