68 sats \ 6 replies \ @BlokchainB 4 Apr \ on: Stacker Saloon
I plan on paying my 100k in sats to keep my territory until I die.
But eventually I will run out of sats. Would SN really just release my territory after say 5 years of monthly payments? 🤔🤔
Unless you plan on dying in the next three years, you might consider paying the 3M to own it outright, then.
reply
But for the long term viability of SN isn’t it better for me to provide a steady income?
reply
I'm not sure. Present money is more valuable than future money. I assume they set the prices such that they're roughly indifferent between the payment methods.
reply
But bitcoin is supposed to change this no?
reply
Investments should still make sense under a bitcoin standard.
That's how I read this:
Present money is more valuable than future money
Under a bitcoin standard, people will invest to provide more value in the long run instead of "invest" to "save money".
"investing" getting used interchangeably for "saving money" might be one of the things I hate the most about the fiat system. investing to save money from inflation ...
reply
No, this is not the same as inflationary or depreciating currency.
This is time preference. People prefer to have things now rather than later.
reply