That's right. Let's not turn Bitcoin into a biochemical research lab like Ethereum.

Zenul_Abidin

> I'd like to not have to worry about Bitcoin for decades.

The same. So from decades perspective two things should be addressed:
- quantum computing
- lack of free market between active (transacting) and passive (holding) Bitcoin users (by naturally reached equilibrium of annual inflation level between both of them)

jk_14

I'm conservative when it comes to the one and only shot we have at a fair decentralized currency. I'd like to not have to worry about Bitcoin for decades. Call it ossification but I'm with Carvalho when he says Taproot opened up a lot more potential than what's been explored thus far. I'm against any further soft forks for a few years at least.

When it comes to how the blockchain is used, I trust fees as the transaction gatekeeper more than anything else. That being said feel free to run what you want on your node.

bitcoin

Luke Dash Jr.: "Big blockers are back. Apparently with Bitcoin Core in support"

saunter

I'm conservative when it comes to the one and only shot we have at a fair decentralized currency. I'd like to not have to worry about Bitcoin for decades. Call it ossification but I'm with Carvalho when he says Taproot opened up a lot more potential than what's been explored thus far. I'm against any further soft forks for a few years at least.

When it comes to how the blockchain is used, I trust fees as the transaction gatekeeper more than anything else. That being said feel free to run what you want on your node.