108 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 3 Apr freebie \ parent \ on: Opinionated MSM Community Feedback Summary meta
using this reply to reply to multiple things in this thread
@anon zaps have no effect on ranking since they are excluded from the web of trust.
If you use @anon to zap your own posts, you only game the system psychologically since we do show your zap visually in the total sat amount but it's not relevant for ranking. So if someone scrolls through recent, this might have an effect on them.
Zaps from @anon also fund the reward pool since 10% go to it instead of the author (like any other zap). That's what is meant with "sybil resistant" in the FAQ:
If you zap @anon, 100% go into the reward pool.
I am not sure if the first sentence is a statement or a suggestion? If it's a suggestion, that's already the case: comments cost 100 sats. Posts cost 100x the normal fee so depending on the territory, this might be pretty high.
Example for ~bitcoin:
https://m.stacker.news/24987
I thought for a long while that @anon is actually too expensive but I get corrected over and over again by all the existing usage of @anon, lol.
reply
Thanks, good to know that it can't be used to game the system
reply