I am personally on the line of ossification / conservative....that is believing that changes should only come once every few years if at all.

"All BIPs and change request should be seen as an attack on Bitcoin" -- John Carvahlo

Each change, whether or not it may "improve" one aspect or another, also introduces unseen potentials (see ordinals) or possibly outright attack vectors (see current xz situation unfolding in OSS).

I think that a true enemy of bitcoin would instead argue for change....the greatest threat to bitcoin comes from making changes that introduce unseen weaknesses, because as it stands now, Bitcoin is secure so the only real way to attack it is to change it.