pull down to refresh
Clearly management wants once monthly rewards.
Just in case for the record: there hasn't been a decision made by "management" other than "let's do it again to rule out if the improvements/harms were caused by its newness."
"let's do it again to rule out if the improvements/harms were caused by its newness."
Awesome! That's the reason I've been giving everyone as to why it made a lot of sense to do it a second month.
I stand corrected
I think that goes into the discussion if long tail of rewards are net good or bad.
Am I right @kr?
yeah that is one concern i have.
one other consideration is the satisfaction one gets from winning something. is it as fun if literally everyone gets a trophy?
personally, i find success more rewarding when i have to work for it and when success is not certain from the beginning, but a challenge.
i think it’s important to echo the point you made in your summary @ek, the bar is pretty low to become one of the top 100 stackers as is.
i don’t know of any stackers who regularly contribute decent content and zaps and are going to miss out on rewards.
Can I make a suggestion? Clearly management wants once monthly rewards. Why not do that without limiting winning stackers to any number? Why 64? Why 100? Everyone gets what they earn, including new stackers.