pull down to refresh

Episode XIV. Block height: 837000. How the Bitcoin halving works and why it (still) matters.
Substack Article: https://carlbmenger.substack.com/p/the-bitcoin-halving ——————————————————- To celebrate the upcoming fourth Bitcoin halving, which occurs in 3,000 blocks (Progress 98.5%) as of the time of this writing, I will cover the most important Bitcoin halving stats and facts. Of course, I get it, a lot of you folks already know that the Bitcoin halving is the event when the dollar value of Bitcoin gets halved, and this happens about every 4 years. So better sell your Bitcoin now, than being sorry later? Or is it more the other way around? Buy one tenth of a Bitcoin now and own a whole Bitcoin after the ‘having’?
After reading this and a lot of other misleading information about the Bitcoin halving, I had no choice but to write this article to clarify once and for all what the halving is and why it still matters. It is just remarkable how little people know about Bitcoin in general and the halving specifically. Even people who are successful in the financial sector make the strangest statements as you can see above. That simply understates how early we still are and is not a judgment but reality.

The Bitcoin Halving

As you may have guessed, Bitcoin halving does not mean that the price of Bitcoin halves or magically appear as more coins in your wallet. I mean, it is not some Shitcoin airdrop, right. Bitcoin halving is an event that reduces the SUPPLY! of newly produced bitcoin by half. To emphasize this once again, it is not the price in dollars that is halved, but the new quantity put into circulation. The new Bitcoin put into circulation is called mining reward, and it is very important for the security of the Bitcoin Network. To understand this better, let us quickly recap how miners are being rewarded for their energy expenditure and for validating transactions on the Bitcoin network.

Proof of Work

Transactions on the Bitcoin network are validated and confirmed by miners using a consensus mechanism called Proof of Work. In Proof of Work, miners are constantly validating transactions and grouping them into blocks. To prove that they did all the necessary work for the Proof of Work algorithm, they try to solve a mathematical problem. The first miner who finds the correct solution submits a newly created block to the network and is rewarded for their hard work with a mining reward. This reward is the main protagonist for the Bitcoin halving, because this is exactly the reward that gets cut in half when the Bitcoin halving occurs.
In January 2009, when the Bitcoin network was started, the first block, called the genesis block, was mined. According to the algorithm, the mining reward started at 50 Bitcoin. There have been three Bitcoin halvings so far (2012, 2016, 2020). This year, 2024, is the fourth Bitcoin halving, where the mining reward gets cut from 6.25 (900 daily) Bitcoin to 3.125 (450 daily). In general, Bitcoin halvings will occur roughly every 4 years until the year 2141, when the Bitcoin blockchain reaches the final number of 32 halvings and stops rewarding miners with block subsidies, so they will have to rely solely on transaction fees (more on this later).
Let us quickly sum this: The incentive to mine Bitcoin and thus to provide computing power and energy to secure the network against attacks and validate Bitcoin transactions is that the miner receives Bitcoin in return, the so-called mining reward. This reward follows a fixed schedule, encoded in Bitcoin's DNA, and halves roughly every four years. This graph summarises the Bitcoin halving concept mathematically.

The Halving Code

Let us go more in depth and start technical because, Code is law, not my words. The code snippet you see below is taken from the Bitcoin Core Github repository from the validation.cpp file, line of code 1750, that is responsible for validation the concept of the Bitcoin halving.
We weren't very precise at the beginning. As you can see when looking at the code, the time of the Bitcoin halvings is not measured in years but in blocks. The number of halvings is calculated using the current block height (nHeight) and subsidy halving interval (nSubsidyHalvingInterval) which is a constant equal to 210,000 that represents the number of blocks after which a halving occurs. Assuming that a block is mined on average every 10 minutes, we can quickly calculate that it should take roughly 4 years to mine 210,000 blocks.
The next two steps are also quite interesting. We have an ‘if’ check that returns 0 when halving is greater or equal to 64, which is mostly used to protect the right-shift operator that comes later. However, this doesn’t mean that there will be 64 halvings, because the actual subsidy will be 0 from the 33rd halving onwards. The next step is to just get the first block subsidy in Satoshis (The smallest unit of Bitcoin, like cents to Euro). COIN constant represents one Bitcoin in Satoshis (One Bitcoin = 100,000,000 Satoshis).
Now we’re getting to the actual calculation, which is performed by using the right-shift bit operation instead of division, for performance reasons. If we start with 5,000,000,000 (50 * 100,000,000) and begin right-shifting it, we can quickly see that the maximum number of times we can iterate is 32. At the 32nd attempt, our reward will be one Satoshi; if we shift one more time, it will give us 0 as a result. We can quickly calculate that if one halving occurs every 4 years on average, this means that the mining reward will stop around the year 2141.

Why does it matter?

There are a few main theories why the Bitcoin halving (still) matters or won‘t. Let us dive into some of them.

Sound Money Theory

The Bitcoin halvings create controlled issuance of Bitcoin with a perfectly predictable monetary policy. It is not true that Bitcoin has no inflation, yet. The current inflation rate is at around 1.8% and will decrease to around 0.8% after the fourth halving. The inflation rate will be decreasing to 0 over time. After that, Bitcoin becomes deflationary as some of the already existing Bitcoin will be lost.
A fixed schedule of issuance means, that there are no hidden expropriations. Even if Bitcoin is currently still inflationary, all participants know this by informing themselves about it. Bitcoin is open source and can be accessed around the globe. The fraudulent thing about the fiat system is precisely that nobody really knows how high the hidden expropriation through inflation is. Making things worse, that’s intended by governments to run huge deficits that needs to be inflated away over time.

Scarcity Theory

From a mere demand/supply perspective, the Bitcoin halving matters tremendously. In theory, Even if the demand for Bitcoin stays the same over time, if the new issuance gets cut in half, every 210,000 blocks, it should cause the price of Bitcoin to go up because the same demand meets less new supply. With the current supply, the market is able to absorb 900 new Bitcoin per day (considering that most miners sell their rewards instead of hoarding to cover expenses). After the halving, the amount of newly created Bitcoin will drop to 450 per day. If the demand stays the same, the price of each coin should increase. The Bitcoin market, of course, is not that easily predictable, and even though previous halvings had a positive impact on the price over time, there are no guarantees, with the exception of short term volatility.

No Impact Theory

More and more people (also in the Bitcoin Space) are of the opinion that the halving has little or no influence on the Bitcoin price, because the amount from 6.25 Bitcoin to 3.125 is no longer as significant as the reduction at the beginning from 50 Bitcoin to 25. However, I cannot relate. Of course, the quantity reduction is no longer as drastic, but the value per Bitcoin has increased significantly over time. At the first halving in 2012, a Bitcoin was worth around $12; now it is hovering around $70k. What does this mean?
After the first halving in 2012, the issuance of new Bitcoin was 3600 daily, multiplied by the price of $12, which equals $43.2k worth of Bitcoin daily, cut from $86.4K before the halving. At them moment (March 2024), Bitcoin’s worth of $63 million are issued daily ($70k * 900), which is reduced to $31.5 million ($70k * 450) after the 2024 halving. Seeing those numbers, it looks to me like the halving has more significance than ever, especially in light of the fact that institutional adoption (i.e. EFTs) has made it easier than ever for larger entities to stack Bitcoin, increasing the potential demand substantially.
Despite the fact that the quantity of Bitcoin is not reduced as drastically as it was at the beginning, the dollar value is. I therefore still assume that the halving will have a significant impact on the price over time. The efficient market theory, i.e., that we know in principle that the Bitcoin halving will occur and that it is therefore already priced in, is a fairy tale. As mentioned at the beginning, knowledge of Bitcoin is marginal, even among financial experts, not to speak of normies, so how can one then claim that all market participants are acting efficiently and rationally? Of course, there are no guarantees, and this is not financial advice! Do your own research, and don’t trust an old, grumpy guy that popped up in your Stacker newsline. Verify!

What happens after 2140

As we have already learned, the last Satoshi (the smallest unit of a Bitcoin) will be mined in 2140. Now, of course, the question rightly arises as to what will happen after that. One thing is for sure: Miners will no longer be incentivised to mine Bitcoin with new coins, but by collecting transaction fees solely. This also means that on-chain transactions will definitely become more expensive over time. Therefore, at some point, not everyone will be able to afford on-chain transactions, so they will only be used when truly necessary (Substantial amounts).
However, this will not make Bitcoin exclusively accessible to the elite, as work is already underway on so-called 2nd layer solutions. The best example in this context is the Bitcoin Lightning Network for small to medium amounts that can be carried out instantly, to buy your cup of freshly ground coffee, for example. But this is another topic, and if you want to dig deeper into the Bitcoin Lightning Network, here is my Lightning Article (#261714)

The End

That's it for this episode. I hope you gathered some valuable knowledge from this one. Keep STACKing and HODLing for the long run. Thanks for reading, and I hope to see you in the next one. Until then, remember: Not the price gets halved during the Bitcoin halving but the quantity of new issued Bitcoin.
₿ critical, ₿ informed, ₿ prepared. Yours,
———————————————-

Stay tuned:

Stay informed:

[XIII] The Bitcoin Lightning Network: #261714 [XII] CBDCs: A Brave New World: #213580 [XI] Valuing Bitcoin: #208983 [X] Solving the Adoption Dilemma: #201172 [IX] NOSTR: Social Media 2.0: #189821 [VIII] The Bitcoin Retirement Plan: #183327 [VII] Bitcoin in Guatemala: #171339 [VI] Bitcoin in El Salvador: #161607
Glad to see you back posting here. It's hard to believe that Kiyosaki would tweet something like that. I don't look at him as a bitcoin guru or anything, but still.
reply
reply
This is an equally ignorant quote:
Of the three, silver is the most affordable for the most people.
Bitcoin is about $70,000 a coin. Gold is about $2,500 coin. Silver is about $35.00 a coin.
As if you must buy a whole bitcoin, or one ounce of gold, for that matter.
reply
116 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiksn 31 Mar
IMO the unit bias is one of the reasons why people shitcoin. "Oh look that coin.. it's totally affordable at 0.001 $ a coin unlike bitcoin.. if it ever went to 1 $ I will be rich". Very similar to pink sheet stocks. I mean people realize they are buying crap, but the psychology combined with pump&dump schemes still makes them do it.
Therefore let's standarize the use of sats (or uhm bits).
reply
Exactly!
reply
Yes, we need @CarlBMenger more often on SN !
reply
I know, I couldn’t believe it myself at first as well. I have nothing against him though and I think he did a good job with his first book to wake up people, but Man that tweet, LOL
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @fiksn 31 Mar
But did you consider the option that he intentionally wrote such a tweet just for engagement farming?
reply
I don’t know. I mean, I read his books and sometimes he was writing kind of weird shit. LOL
reply
Very nice primer. A refreshing response to Kiyosaki's revolting and cringe advice.
Just to tear down his tweet further with a lot less grace than Carl did:
I am buying 10 more Bitcoin before April.
This invites $5 wrench attacks and normalizes publicly claiming how much Bitcoin you have, own, or plan to buy. This breaks the first rule of Bitcoin.
"The Having"
No. It's the "Halving". Kiyosaki positions himself in the Have class, and then provides cringe advice and fake news to the Have-nots. Carl explains the halving well.
If you can't afford a whole Bitcoin you may want to consider buying 1/10 of coin, via the new ETF's or Satoshi's.
Terrible advice. Breaks the second first rule of Bitcoin: NYKNYC. Buy the ETF?!?🤮 And wth does "buying 1/10 of a coin via ... Satoshi's." even mean?🤦
If the Bitcoin process works as designed, you may own a whole Bitcoin by the end of this year.
This just confirms Kiyosaki's ludicrous misunderstanding. Not only is he clueless about the tech, he completely misses the fundamental value of Bitcoin.
No. 1/10 of a bitcoin will not magically become a whole Bitcoin by the end of the year. Nor will 99.9999% of a Bitcoin become, on it's own, a whole Bitcoin. Ever.
reply
30 sats \ 5 replies \ @mo 31 Mar
It's a goldbug, totally understandable he makes this kind of mistakes. What else you'd expect?
reply
I would expect someone with 2.5 million followers and millions of USD invested in Bitcoin to do the most basic research. At a minimum.
reply
Indeed. I mean it’s not some complicate shit, it’s just the fundamentals.
reply
I mean those folks should recognise the importance of Bitcoin first.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @mo 31 Mar
Agree, I assume is part of the current fomo wave
reply
Always has been.
reply
Exactly. Just mind blowing to see so called ‘experts’ talking nonsense about #Bitcoin.
Nothing against Kyosaki in general, I think he did a tremendous job with his first book to wake up people of the fiat scam.
reply
I wonder if he meant you could own the equivalent value of 1 bitcoin - at its current price 🤷‍♀️ I was pretty shocked to read that tweet, i know he's one of the "mainstream" people but good grief..
reply
deleted by author
reply
Awesome to see you back and sharing great info. As bitcoin class of spring 2021, I’m looking forward to my first halving. More bullish than ever!
reply
This is the way!
reply
Great post. First time reading your writing and I enjoyed it.
reply
Thanks for the Feedback. Truly appreciate it.
reply
What! Kiyosaki singing pop for ETFs. Can't believe!
I thought, he knows everything and had always praised him for his works but now, it's over.
reply
Yes, I unfortunately don't own much due to a low budget and not able to afford to keep up investing, BUT I'll definitely be making a purchase when I get paid this week!
reply
No one owns enough Bitcoin. I can feel you.
reply
Bookmarked 👍🚀
reply
This is the way 🚀
reply
Crawling out of the bunker to set the record straight. Love to see it.
Any theories or research as to why 210,000 blocks was chosen?
reply
Satoshi simply backed into it. 1 sat for each block of the final epoch (halving period), 2 sats for the blocks of the 2nd to last epoch, so on and so forth all the way back to the first epoch (50 ₿ per block).
This gets you exactly 20,999,999.97690000 bitcoins. Believe it or not, this is the ACTUAL total maximum supply of bitcoin - not 21,000,000.0000000, as many commonly believe. It is simply rounded to 21M ₿.
Now that you understand that 21M ₿ was fairly arbitrary, in that it was likely "backed into" by nature of this halving schedule, you can probably understand why 210,000 blocks was the duration chosen to regulate the issuance. It simply gives us a fairly round number of roughly 21M coins... instead of something like 20,638,011.94747192 coins.
reply
I knew about the total issuance but never considered the ‘fairly round’ issuance in my thinking. Not sure why.
Instead believing 21 had a special relevance for Satoshi. Maybe it did, but schedule needed to align with the supply. Glad you managed to zap that thought in the bud. Thanks for taking the time to make us plebs wiser!
reply
My pleasure.
reply
Good read! Here's something I'd add ;)
reply
Nice addition.
reply