I like where you’re going with this, but I wouldn’t want anyone to self-censor themselves because of this info. This was your moment of enlightenment… #485859.
For me, i’d suggest not to overthink # of stackers zapping too much. Generally if you’re cheerful on the site and delving deeper into topics and moving conversations forward, people will notice. It need not be 30+ stackers.
Those constructive conversations are much more important to me than just pleasing the masses. I do personally try to put more thought into posts. Most of my posts these days are 4+ hours of work. Many 24+ hours. And I only comment these days on items that really grab my attention or to which I can offer a perspective. Not because of what stackers want. That will only ever lead to burnout / dissatisfaction. Doesn’t ever prevent me from writing a quick post to ask a question or to share an important link I discovered. Just now I may share more context when doing so, to be more considerate to the stacker readers.
So essentially, that stat only matters to me on posts, not so much comments. I do wish it were more visible as a non-hover stat, but the fact it’s there is awesome in itself. It can certainly help us offer-up better value & improve as writers.
Those constructive conversations are much more important to me than just pleasing the masses.
This is key point! We are here to clear-up things, educate noobs, debating urgent matters (not shitcoineries) and learn more from each others.
The sats, yes are an incentive to be more active, but should not be the main goal.
reply