pull down to refresh
233 sats \ 7 replies \ @kr 25 Mar \ on: Why should someone own a territory? alter_native
right now the territory is not tied to either your username or the territory name.
archived territories can be purchased by other stackers, and you can change the name of your territory at any time.
we have talked about how selling a popular territory to other stackers for more money might work, but no concrete plans yet.
have you thought about how you might like a peer-to-peer territory marketplace to work?
So an archived territory will sell for the same price as a brand new one, I take it?
Seems like someone could just post that they want to sell their territory, and assuming it has some value over a new territory, people could make offers, and then they make the transfer.
reply
reply
reply
Interesting. I assume the value would be in the content?
reply
This makes the idea of evergreen content all the more crucial -- I hadn't thought of that before, but the more the site offers tools / support to curate evergreen-ness, the more viable and attractive territories are -- like a fertile plot of land that keeps spitting out potatoes or whatever.
reply
It is a territory. Seems like it should be like digital bitcoin real estate
reply
yes correct. Take ~builders. it's a place for an existing community using the territory as an alternative to... let's say slack or discord.
I think the most important is to engage with the community or create one. We'll hopefully have soon some functionality to allow people to zap or chip in territories, or also multy-ownership will be a great thing to have. You cannot do it alone, in the meantime, invite people to join you, create contents in your territory and interact with it actively! That's my advice and approach
reply