20 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest meta
To clarify, is the "new model" you're talking about the month-long challenge or my proposal?
I agree with you that things were working OK (I would go so far as to say they were working well). I had been aware of this incentive problem for a while and wanted to articulate it so that everyone was aware things could go the way of chasing virality.
It was fine as it was, yes there was an element of engagement farming to put it that way, but those posts were generally easy to spot and the free zapping market took care of the rest.
reply
I'm more concerned about the flip side of engagement farming, which is disingenuous zapping.
reply
How do you mean?
reply
The rewards incentivize zapping content that you expect others to zap, rather than zapping content because you like it.
reply
Ohhhh, I didn't know it worked like that. I just put the calculation of daily rewards down to some mysterious algorithm that I'd never truly understand, and that as fine with me.
So, as it stands, if you zap a post soon after it's posted, and then it goes on to gain traction with other zaps, this gives you a greater share of the daily rewards? I can see if you were to reply to such a post with something inciteful then that reply is likely to be seen more and therefore probably gain more zaps, but I think that's just natural.
I think most people just use it honestly, that is, gaming the system is too much like hard work and the simplest thing is just to engage with what catches your eye and zap what you like.
reply
Eventually, behavior conforms to incentives.
reply
A profound truth.
reply