We agree that that's the goal. I was pointing out that this is a common and generally unresolved problem in a bunch of settings. Our best available signal of what's good is what people pay for.

Undisciplined

ahh I see, my bad, I'm tired and about to hit the sack. When I said "zapping content that is genuinely good" I meant zapping content that people themselves think is genuinely good - rather than zapping what they think will get them the most rewards.

justanumber

Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest

I was responding to this line:
>  find a genuine and equitable model that rewards users for zapping content that is genuinely good

I think nostr gives us a glimpse of what we'd get without the incentives on SN. There are always incentives, just like there's always an algorithm, and they all have their own consequences.