21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 20 Mar
The IRC logs are funny to read:
exactly 22 hours later:
Thanks for sharing, I really like to dig into bitcoin history.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @cointastical 21 Mar freebie
You can see the moment at which there was no further debate as to what to do:
http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2013/03/11#l1363045508.0
Which is further evidence that it is economic nodes and not miners who control Bitcoin. In this case, there was mt. Gox with like 80% (educated guess) of the economic activity of Bitcoin at the time. So a miner (pool) switches to follow the will of the economic nodes (i.e., whichever side Mt. Gox was on), even when that one pool alone had majority hashrate (both sides combined).
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 20 Mar
Very good piece from Bitcoin history.
Thank you for remembering this.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Tony OP 20 Mar
It is super interesting! We also added this article on all Bitcoin forks originally from BitMex Research: https://21ideas.org/en/bitcoin-forks/
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xIlmari 21 Mar
Bitcoin Core devs no longer have the respect and "strong leadership". They lost it in the Ordinals debacle (starting with allowing it in the first place, and trying to "fix" it through basically censorship). I don't dare to think what a repeat of such an event would turn into in present day.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cyberpunk02 20 Mar
thanks @Tony
reply