pull down to refresh
121 sats \ 2 replies \ @cryptocoin 19 Jul 2022
reply
126 sats \ 1 reply \ @0260378aef 19 Jul 2022
Talking their own book as usual.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin 19 Jul 2022
Exactly.
Huge growth in sanctions violations, they say.
Has there been a single prosecution using this data? Not that I know of.
reply
110 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xtr 19 Jul 2022
Chainanalysis can go fuck themselves but actually pretty impressed they were able to write/publish this paragraph.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @CypherPoet OP 19 Jul 2022
Reminds me of how the DoD occasionally commends journalists for thorough war reporting 🤷♂️
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xtr 19 Jul 2022
lol yeah
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @tosky 19 Jul 2022
100% - kind of contradicting their own existence but here we are. In privacy it is not one for me and other for thee - we shall all aspire to total freedom of transaction and solid privacy primitives on top of it.
reply
110 sats \ 0 replies \ @Spartan 19 Jul 2022
Really sick of needing to justify mixing. I pay my taxes, and have no intention of avoiding them. However, I believe privacy is a fundamental right. That is why I mix.
This is a hard-line issue for me. Coinjoins should be protected at all costs, and chainalysis is cancer.
reply