pull down to refresh
26 sats \ 3 replies \ @ablunderfilledlife 6 Mar \ on: Krugman: Low Unemployment Causes Inflation, Not Monetary Expansion econ
Fascinating history here that I had no idea about! It provides a clear picture of what inflation is and links it to the imagery of dilution that I have always associated with inflation.
I am curious: Krugman and governments often believe an increase in prices is the cause of inflation, rather than the symptom. If the evidence points to monetary expansion as the cause, what evidence they see or claim that allows their short-sidedness to persist?
It's more accurate to say that Krugman and many other contemporaries think inflation is rising prices and can have causes other than monetary expansion.
The original meaning of "inflation" referred to an expanding money supply, which causes price increases.
The answer to your question will depend on whether or not you think they're genuine in their stated beliefs. I believe Paul Krugman is just a highly talented partisan activist and he doesn't actually believe what he's saying. His goal is to justify whatever his side is trying to do, which just so happens to involve printing tons of money. When Republicans are in power he makes completely different arguments. As such, he's just using sophisticated sounding economics jargon that doesn't actually make sense, in order to persuade people that his side's policy makes sense.
reply
Ah, so he in particular is an enemy of the truth in service of whatever cause he's attached to. Can the same be said of the academics holding the position that inflation is rising prices?
reply
That's more due to ignorance of their own discipline's history. They just think that's what the word means.
reply