I’ll go to hack a pinning toolkit, the easy pinnings it’s not that much work.



I think that would be a good idea.   It would raise awareness into the area and force investment into research.  

Without that you get these debates, which ultimately are decided by politics and ones ability to debate...

nicosey

Certainly consensus code is very costly in itself. However mishandled security failures are even more expensive on the long-term, e.g TheDAO hack and the _moral hazard_ culture this generated in ETH.

Of course, this is always an option to go to publish a pinning toolkit and see the Lightning ecosystem jeopardized. In those matters it’s always good to have ethical self-restraint and respect a strict boundary on how much sensitive information you reveal.

theariard

bitcoin

AJ Towns censoring on Delving Bitcoin to cover Bitcoin Core backdoors ?

Code is costlier, but you need consensus and that I am afraid is harder to get and only working examples with proofs will stop what you may see is political...