When it comes to freedom, I think often times people tend to forget that in order to have freedom, one must embrace and take on responsibility. The observation of people giving up freedom for perceived security, to me, is actually people unwilling to take on the responsibility in order to be free. The past generation probably did fight very hard to gain their freedom and to make sure the next generation have the opportunity to be free. But ultimately, it is only an opportunity for the next generation; and the next generation is solely responsible to grasp and hold onto this opportunity via personal responsibility.
I think it's a combination of what you describe and an inability to realize they're being conned by shameless sociopaths.
reply
71 sats \ 4 replies \ @gnilma 3 Mar
Isn't the inability to realize they're being conned a symptom of not taking responsibility to think for oneself? Outsourcing thinking to media and "experts", while following "expert advice" without applying critical thinking. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
reply
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
When that's the dynamic, then I agree. However, the con is so massive that I don't think it's reasonable to expect people to be able to see through it.
In Plato's cave, the problem wasn't that people didn't take responsibility, it was that some deranged sociopath had severely restricted the information they had access to.
reply
81 sats \ 2 replies \ @gnilma 3 Mar
Control of information definitely plays a major role in keeping the con successful. However, with advancements in technology and the emergence of the internet, the information is out there for the taking. I think it's getting harder and also getting easier to run the con these days. Easier because it is so easy and cheap to distribute lies and propaganda to the masses through online sources such as social media and "reputable" sources. But harder because if someone suspects they're being duped, it is often not too hard to find information to either confirm or deny their suspicion. You can actually do your own research and use your own logic and intuition based on your findings to formulate a truth that makes sense to you.
reply
We are getting to where the only people still being duped are exactly the ones you were talking about who are abdicating thinking for themselves.
I sympathize with people who just want to trust the experts and then go on with their lives. In a functional society, trusting the experts would be a good enough heuristic for most people. We can't figure everything out ourselves after all, so the battle is really in figuring out who to trust and what to trust them about.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @gnilma 3 Mar
Agreed.
reply
Fair points.
reply