pull down to refresh
yes. but I did stated that this new World Elections have a different voting system and those voted only show up on a list of voted for or against. and beside this since it's an unique thing those that vote are not from the same country as the one being voted. so for example I would choose to vote one day for Michael Saylor and against Jim Cramer. So I choose this two out of a very big list and expressed my sentiment. You know this kind of things happen all the time on daily basis but are not really captured.
reply
I don't mind the thought experiment, but it's a non-starter precisely because we are not on the same page on voting, nor on the same page about 'economic prosperity and well-being.' Many believe 51% votes are immoral to the 49%. Many think voting is the least worst way to solve things locally, but gets more and more worst as the problems, and people involved - gets bigger. 'economic prosperity' is not in the interest of those who currently hold power, only with those who don't have it. 'well-being' is more likely to be re-defined by hired propagandists to avoid revolt by the proles than to be embraced genuinely by decisionmakers.