pull down to refresh

"The industry knew decades ago that recycling was never viable in the long term, and now we’re all being poisoned by its product.
Hardly any plastics can be recycled. You’d be forgiven for not knowing that, given how much messaging Americans receive about the convenience of recycling old bottles and food containers—from the weekly curbside collections to the “chasing arrows” markings on food and beverage packaging. But here’s the reality: Between 1990 and 2015, some 90 percent of plastics either ended up in a landfill, were burned, or leaked into the environment. Another recent study estimates that just 5 to 6 percent are successfully recycled.
While those numbers may surprise you, these sorts of statistics aren’t news to the companies that produce plastics. For more than 30 years, the industry knew precisely how impractical it is to recycle them, according to a new report from the Center for Climate Integrity. A trade association called the Vinyl Institute concluded in a 1986 report that “recycling cannot be considered a permanent solid waste solution” to plastics, as it merely prolongs the time until an item is disposed of.” Still, facing public backlash over the growing amount of plastics being incinerated and piling up in landfills, manufacturers and their lobbyists sold recycling as an easy solution, warding off potential legislation to ban or limit plastics.
This, of course, has echoes of Big Tobacco and Big Oil, both of which withheld crucial information from the public for decades—causing untold damage to human health and the planet, respectively. Both industries are paying dearly for it. Is Big Plastic due for a similar reckoning?"
How many of you already knew this?
I learned from the Penn & Teller Bullshit! episode first, I think.
What's worse is a lot of it just ends up bundled up and stacked on container ships bound for SE Asia. When weather picks up, it gets swept overboard all the time, making a contribution to the great Pacific garbage patch. I think running it through an incinerator and recouping some energy may be the least worst option.
It's amazing how many problems originate from incentive misalignment. This is just one more example. I like how the milk industry used to reuse glass milk bottles - I wish more companies had a cradle-to-grave approach, but it's cheaper to abandon responsibility for your product as soon as it's off the shelf.
reply
it's cheaper to abandon responsibility for your product as soon as it's off the shelf.
Absolutely true, where there is no accountability for externalities. Major manufacturers, chemical plants, factories, all have incentive to retain conditions where there is a total lack of accountability, which means more captured regulatory agencies, more complex legal structures, more difficult lawsuits, less environmental testing, and even a culture that doesn't understand science. RFK has a lot to say about this.
reply
Wow, didn't know that. That just pisses me off
reply
  1. Recycle, recycle, recycle.
  2. Learn that plastic recycling is BS
  3. Keep recycling plastic, out of sheer guilt
reply
If they would abandon recycling, it would mean they hate nature, and all their friends, and puppies.
reply
Maybe stop buying disposable water bottles and baggies, which are poisoning your food
reply
Every chance I get, whenever someone makes a big stink about trying to throw something way in the right bin, I share some of this information.
The propaganda is strong with these people though. They are absolutely sure they are making a difference.
reply
It's like a religious part of their identity
reply
What’s the incentive for government behind the recycling buzz then? Fake GDP growth and false reasons for increased spending?
reply