1817 sats \ 5 replies \ @anon 27 Feb \ on: AJ Towns censoring on Delving Bitcoin to cover Bitcoin Core backdoors ? bitcoin
This you:
If I estimate myself victim of being harassed by your behavior or you’re overriding your janitorial role in the maintenance of this communication plateform, please be known there is always the ability to pursue remediation in front of the Australian authority or any other competent one.
write
preview
613 sats \ 1 reply \ @petertodd 27 Feb
The interesting thing is @theariard allegedly said that after he was incorrectly accused of making legal threats by @ajtowns. Not before. Reads quite differently in that context: obviously people always have the ability to get the law involved.
I say allegedly because those archives are unsigned and untimestamped, so we're trusting a bunch of people with interests in this discust that all this is actually correct. @theariard should clarify if the archived message really was written by him.
reply
77 sats \ 0 replies \ @theariard OP 1 Mar
Yes this is very clear I do have a vested interest in the discussion. So don’t trust me, verify.
I cannot assert on the archived message correctness as I can't consult it from an external public URL (as of block 832728 - 00000000000000000001349107f838fb193dda1fc5395c45548f8cb6f30cfc5d).
One that could be OTS e.g. I have not verified if AJ is technically able to un-archive my post for everyone publicity.
reply
725 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 27 Feb
source
reply
66 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 27 Feb
LMAO - ragequit engage
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @theariard OP 3 Mar
there are sane angers, when you think the process is broken.
at least it’s good to slow down and take time to explain why you think things are broken, and do a honest attempt to fix them.
reply