Governments in the US subsidize immigration through a bevy of welfare programs. The effect of subsidization is predictable: you get more of what you subsidize. This is true for student loans, ethanol, immigrants, and more.
This has been a hot topic both on Stacker News and wherever else people spend their time. I thought this article laid out the current state of how much migration is costing the American taxpayer.
The article also makes the important point that we aren't just talking about open borders. Anything that receives subsidies will end up exceeding the optimal equilibrium level. That means there are too many migrants living in the US for everyone's own good. Since the migrants are presumably coming because it makes them better off, we can conclude that it is making Americans even more worse off.
There are plenty of relevant caveats to what I just said, but that is the starting point of how to think about the situation economically.
I published a similar post this morning on the other thread, for the UK. #432245
reply
The article says there are 11 million illegal immigrants but doesn’t breakdown undocumented by state or region. It mentions problems in Denver and NYC.
The bulk of illegal aliens live in Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico.
reply
The bulk of illegal aliens live in Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico.
Sure, but those places are more accustomed to it. It's not surprising if the biggest problems arise in places that aren't used to it.
reply
The Migration Policy Center reports that in 2021, 32 percent of immigrants (both citizen and non-citizen) used government health insurance. That's comparable to 38 percent of natives.
Yet, even by this conservative measure of immigrant welfare usage, the best we can say is that immigrants use welfare at a rate slightly lower than that of natives. One could argue that, at the low end, immigrants receive (per capita) about 70 to 75 cents for every welfare dollar that goes to natives. That's not exactly "good news" given that overall federal spending on social benefits amounts to about half of the annual $6.3 trillion budget and is clearly out of control. The fact that natives get most of this is hardly an exoneration of immigrants. It's more of an indictment of native-born Americans, millions of whom exploit their most productive fellow citizens every month to keep the government benefits flowing.
We need to limit all immigration and applicants must be vetted for financial assets and ability.
Low or unskilled applicants must be rejected
reply
I don't know if it will surprise you that my position isn't that different from yours. I'd favor a sponsorship program, rather than government vetting. You can come in if a credible sponsor will take responsibility for your social costs in the event you don't pay your way.
That would mean no free school, no free medical care, no free roads, etc. Either the immigrant pays or their sponsor pays.
reply
reply
For sure. Some of that is accounting fiction though. Hospitals radically overprice so that they can write-off more "losses" when it comes to tax compliance.
reply
Regardless of the accounting fiction, this situation is unsustainable.
Imagine a world where illegal aliens are denied all medical care including emergency or life threatening.
Hospitals can focus resources on more important people.
Hospital care is zero sum. Hospital beds especially ICU are limited.