I read this with a different eye after having read Chip Wars -- the big chip companies have been spooning the government since the earliest days, using similar arguments the whole time. I know the standard argument will be "let the free market be free" and it's true, that will produce, globally, the best allocation of resources.
But if you're a nation-state, and you don't want the globally-best allocation to result in you having no foundries in your own country, how do you feel then? Or if you are entirely dependent on someone else, perhaps a hostile force, for your food or energy? An uneasy set of principles to hold in a practical world.
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @clr 18 Feb
Yeah, nation-states gonna nation-state. I get that.
But how does that improve my life or the life of most people reading this?
reply
It ensures evil dictators like Xi don't rug pull the free world, for one.
reply