0 sats \ 6 replies \ @TomK OP 15 Feb \ parent \ on: EU discusses expropriation of frozen Russian assets news
i see war from a completely different perspective. for me the question is always: cui Bono question mark and the fairy tale of wanting to defend democracy in a corrupt shithole Ukraine again with armed force is more than ridiculous. your humanitarian aid with weapons ammunition and money has so far cost 600,000 ukrainian lives, instead of letting this thing run its course after three weeks, letting Putin install a new government in Kiev and letting this Slavic conflict settle into itself.
The russians are to blame for those deaths! Otherwise your argument is contradictory.
We dont defend ourselves because we are blameless. We defend from invaders.
Putin does not defend human rights. Admit that quickly or stop talking.
Germany has fallen prey to russian subversion and you now pay the price.
Goodbye germany.
Learn your mistake. Be nice to the devil and he will crush you.
reply
The devil.... omg!
please, where did the United States defend democratic values in Afghanistan in Syria in Iraq 1 in Iraq 2 in Kosovo etc etc in Vietnam in Korea? this democracy bullshit has really been hammered into people's heads by the press, which shields this war machine from any criticism. once again clearly stated: Boris Johnson came to Kiev in April 2022 at the moment when the peace treaty between selenski and Putin was to be negotiated, which was immediately afterwards off the table again. before the Minsk treaty, NATO had already armed, trained and built up the largest NATO army in Ukraine directly on the Russian border. after the Maidan coup in 2014, the Russian population in the Donbass, yes they are Russians! decimated. and the warring faction earns massive sums of money from every conflict. and that's what this is all about. you are defending the very people who are making money from this massacre. once again as a reminder: after the fall of the iron curtain, it was clearly discussed that NATO would not move a millimeter further east. Putin, for his part, offered several times in 2001 to make Russia a member of NATO. that would have made NATO obsolete and of course destroyed the war machine.
reply
I simply disagree. You’re reading the narrative. The narrative is what they want the public to quibble about. Narratives are discussed in the open.
National strategies remain the same regardless of what politicians say openly.
Minsk treaty - a distraction that doesn’t change national strategic objectives. Some idea Boris had to end the conflict - a narrative. Putin invaded for future Russian prosperity. Land, resources, geographic access to ports and good land for crops, etc. it’s essential. It’s not something you negotiate with. If you’re starving and going to die, can you be persuaded to not steal some bread 🥖? The idiot that says “ok” starves and dies.
Lie to the camera but continue doing what your advisors have game planned behind closed doors. Follow the game plan to keep you and your allies safe - say whatever you need to in order to keep the people focused on their TikTok and sports and red/blue politics.
reply
reply
And I love discussing with you 😋
I always read yours posts on SN. Keep it up.