"As a result, an employee who holds any amount of a cryptocurrency or stablecoin may not participate in a particular matter if the employee knows that particular matter could have a direct and predictable effect on the value of their cryptocurrency or stablecoins."
At first I thought it was that only people who hate it could write policy on it, but at least as written, its just if the policy would affect the price.
I hope this means that we will have fair and unbiased policies.
"As a result, an employee who holds any amount of a cryptocurrency or stablecoin may not participate in a particular matter if the employee knows that particular matter could have a direct and predictable effect on the value of their cryptocurrency or stablecoins."
At first I thought it was that only people who hate it could write policy on it, but at least as written, its just if the policy would affect the price.
I hope this means that we will have fair and unbiased policies.
The problem is nearly any policy will affect price. It biases policy toward hostiles given most non-holders are neutral or negative.
It's also weird/unfortunate that we exempt the dollar from such policies.
Yeah...I mean they make policies specifically to reinforce the dollar....
so this means lummis is done?
Probably, unless she dumps her bags.
so this means lummis is done?