Oh hey, I got this one. First I would like to start with a basic fallacy lots on Kensians make. Its the mistake the Federal Reserve made about inflation. Do not assume any variable will be increasing at a contant rate.

So the msot simple economic equation is productivity = wealth. The Kenesian system (which is a system designed to prop up the business of usury) sees that the bubble that debt creates causes a reccession as prices need to adjust to the new money supply as the money is being destroyed (you have to understand that credit or debt is spendable as money just as much as money. Therefore, debt is money creation). They argue for bailouts and "liquidity" to effectively bail out the bank business model and keep the supply of money the same. It is a way of making the inflation caused by borrowing, official. It takes debt is technically money because its just as spendable, to here's some more money for your debt.

Now, get rid of debt. Money remains constant. People don't get suddenly rug pulled by a debt bubble burst. People plan around the economic situation they have as things are.

So why would savers invest in businesses to pull forward economic growth? Because the value of Bitcoin will not increase without it. As a result, savers will invest in businesses they believe will outpace the productivity of everyone else and if a business venture does not seem to be able to outpace the growth of the larger economy, then may I suggest, such a business venture is not worth pursuing. It would indicate that there are more productive things we can do with our value and time.

Sorry edit: I want to add in the implications this has on volunteering and charity work as well because volunteerism does have a measurable impact on GDP, but I've already written an article here.