Interestingly, SN is in a bit of a sweet spot for me. Large enough to generate interactions on most posts you make, but small enough that you don't need to be hypercompetitive for attention. In that sense, I think to me the definition of flourishing is:
People can post their genuine thoughts and expect a diverse range of genuine responses in return.
Communities that are too small fail that definition because you can't always expect a response, or diverse responses. Larger communities can fail because they lack authenticity---people start having to optimize for likes and attention, rather than simply posting what they think.
When I first stumbled across SN not too long ago I read the guide and saw the residual sat rewards for referring new members. I remember thinking "oooh nice, I'll try to spread the message about this far and wide.. easy sats! Ka-ching!" (What's the best Bitcoin transaction sound?)
But, when I spent some time here it reminded me of the early days of some subculture forums I've been a part of in years past. The posts felt more intimate and "real."
So, perhaps selfishly, I decided to hold off on publicly singing the praises of SN, at least for now. Didn't want to do anything to mess with the vibe.
reply
I feel the same way and it leads me to be a little anxious about what growth will do to the site. At the same time I'm hopeful that the thoughtful community already here will guide that growth well.
Eventually, towns become cities, though.
reply
Towns attract clowns. Some not all
reply
27 sats \ 0 replies \ @doofus 9 Feb
Posting fees should help
reply
Can we have too many users, not counting the obvious burner accounts?
reply