110 sats \ 3 replies \ @mo 4 Feb \ on: Territories, digital scarcity, and cultural capital meta
Noticed a lot of folks left SN time ago, and this territories experiment was kind of the drop making the cream overflow.
What I can see now, it's all just pure revenue driven conversations... no more valuable knowledge around for bitcoiners (that supposed to be the main goal here). Just people angry for sats placing traps and fishing hooks all around, trying to get stackers attention. Shame on you!
The 100k per month did not stop cheap sharks to swim around, and they also have the courage to complain that is too expensive. F off!
Where are the valuable conversation and open exchange of ideas and opinions SN was made from?
reply
It maybe look's contradictory, I know... my aim was not to profit from it in the first place, but to create a safe P2P marketplace for stackers and bitcoiners, where people could connect safely because part of a trusted community, even for IRL trades. Doesn't look like that any more (two months later)
reply
This Territories talk is actually a good thing, in my opinion. It's much better to experiment early, find the things that are not working, and remove them fast before they begin to fester.
I have seen this in real life community building, a couple bad moves is all it takes to get people to defect. The more important thing is to adjust on the fly, give time and attention to your community and to always be recruiting.
The overall goal with community building is to bring more fruit or bounty to everyone. My goal is to try to do that in the ~builders community. Building community is not hard it just requires a level of sacrifice most people are not accustomed to.
reply