one signal that someone is a good member of the internet on a bitcoin/v4v standard could be whether they zap good content when they see it.
importantly, there can’t be any profit motive for this to be a reliable test. it has to be a zap out of the goodness of one’s own heart.
406 sats \ 1 reply \ @joda 31 Jan
I don't think this is analogous because it isn't costless.
Some people are too poor to give, or maybe they think anyone with any sats is "rich enough" and give their money to charity instead.
reply
fair, but then again returning a shopping cart isn’t cost less either.
seems like a money vs. time distinction.
reply
46 sats \ 1 reply \ @rarson 30 Jan
What's good content to one person might not be good content to another.
reply
right, but just the fact that someone chooses to zap something is the indicator i’m thinking about, doesn’t really matter if there is community agreement on how good it is.
reply