Seems dead in here again, maybe I can spark a discussion.
We frequently discuss government bans on Bitcoin, drawing parallels to executive order 6112. However, I believe the initial wave of controls we'll see will target real estate ownership. As housing continues to soar to preposterous valuations, the priced out younger generations will increasingly support political parties advocating for stringent measures against those who own multiple homes (investors and landlords).
Maybe there will come a time where owning a house is seen as more risky than holding Bitcoin? And in that case, in what direction do you think that capital will flow?
Maybe there will come a time where owning a house is seen as more risky than holding Bitcoin???
it already is - others can take away your house but they can never take away your Bitcoin, if you know what you are doing:)
reply
I agree. 99% of people on the other hand think it insane!
reply
the real insane thing is why people keep asking permission to do things - licenses, certificates, approvals... when everyone is in fact equal.
reply
Channelling @DarthCoin there!
reply
reply