Amazon lost money for decades investing/researching/iterating on automation and it's not like they're publishing the blueprints for their competition to read. Walmart has only just started investing more in automation after it became clear that Amazon's bet was starting to pay off.
do you think these kinds of fully automated warehouses have the same economies of scale that Amazon and Walmart’s human powered warehouses had?
or is there an outcome where robot-powered warehouses level the playing field between large and small merchants/suppliers?
In USA, employees are extra expensive. Employers have to pay minimum wage, income tax, health insurance/benefits, safety accommodations, deal with the potential to be sued for injuries or discrimination.
Even non US employees will get sick, show up late, screw up at their job, steal things, have to be trained, they cause drama which impacts morale and they only work 8-12 hour shifts. Shopping for a employee is a process often requiring background checks, interviews, drug tests, contracts, and on-boarding rituals.
There will be a point at which automated labor out competes manual labor at everything and having human workers will be as barbaric and inefficient as having rows of women using typewriters to publish a report instead of using a inkjet printer.
At the same time, every household or community will probably have access to a local micro-factory (3d printer farm/factory) of its own so they won't need the services of the large mega-corp warehouses as much. Kinda like how the adoption of the microwave likely reduced the demand for restaurants.
reply