I have a bitcoin cashback app that allows me to buy vouchers with sats and get cashback in sats. I also have an app that works in a similar way, but with fiat.
Both apps only allow me to withdraw once I've accumulated a certain amount. The bitcoin app offers a lower rate. For example, for the same voucher, it may offer 3%, while the fiat app may offer 7%.
I've used the bitcoin app a few times, but I've never used the fiat one. I know I may not be able to withdraw for several months and it just freaks me out, the prospect of having to hold a fiat balance for that long, because by the time I withdraw it, that 7% may buy me fewer sats than the 3% I can lock in now by getting paid in sats.
With sats I don't care if I can withdraw the same day or in 6 months, because sats are already the ultimate storage form anyway. As long as I don't get rugged, that is. But whenever someone promises to pay you, it does require trust, you can't remove that from the equation.
Similarly, with my fiat gigs sometimes I have to wait 2-3 months to get paid, which sucks (and can even be viewed as a scam), because statistically (i.e. in terms of EV) it means getting paid less than I was promised, and less by an unpredictable amount. If they paid in BTC, it wouldn't matter how long I wait, as long as they do pay in the end, because sats are sats, no decay function (let alone an unpredictable one) built into them to include in your economic calculation.
nothing feels as good as getting paid in sats, nothing!
reply
Fiat or BTC, what's the "real" money now?
reply
reply