254 sats \ 2 replies \ @notgeld 24 Jan
Why. Why not 6102.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 24 Jan
69 69 is a more sly way to do it. ahaahaa
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 24 Jan
That would have been so much better.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 25 Jan
They are now hitting them with inscriptions.....
https://mempool.space/tx/11b344453791789b47ea13ebde3a9d42794d8f42d1735c6ace6aedadcb5aedd5
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @fiatbad 25 Jan
Wow. The fee to send such a small amount was probly more than the amount itself.
This is actually really fascinating. No other ETF in history could have random people send the raw asset to the custodian. Really cool. Might be an eye opening concept to no-coiners still on the fence.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @RdioActiv 25 Jan
Knowing how the stock market is basically run by HFT's, I wonder if such a "donation" could cause a cascading sell off?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 25 Jan
Yea, but the HFT's are observing inflows/outflows through the traditional stock market rails into the ETF. They have zero infrastructure for viewing the underlying AUM.
Still. Your question intrigues me. Did you have a specific scenario in mind for how that could happen?
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 24 Jan
Twitter2Nitter
Clearnet: nitter.net | nitter.it | nitter.cz | nitter.at | nitter.unixfox.eu | nitter.poast.org | nitter.privacydev.net | nitter.d420.de | nitter.sethforprivacy.com | nitter.nicfab.eu | bird.habedieeh.re | nitter.salastil.com | nt.ggtyler.dev
Tor: nitter7bryz3..q553qd.onion | 26oq3gioiwcm..b4wwid.onion | vfaomgh4jxph..dauqad.onion | nitraeju2mip..evvuqd.onion | codeine3hsqn..brdqqd.onion
I2P: axd6uavsstsr..zf4q.b32.i2p | u6ikd6zndl3c..n2qa.b32.i2p | gseczlzmiv23..aoua.b32.i2p | tm4rwkeysv3z..4weq.b32.i2p | vernzdedoxuf..agva.b32.i2p
Lokinet: nitter.priv.loki/
Nitter is a free and open source alternative Twitter front-end focused on privacy and performance. Click here for more information.
reply