I think technically GDP needs to decline 2 quarters in a row to be a recession.
reply
Yeah, Q1 was negative as well. So we reached this definition.
reply
Oh, I missed that.
reply
This was a Q1 GDP revision, not a Q2 print. According to https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/us-q1-gdp-revisions-scream-stagflation
reply
Don't forget to link your sources!
reply
reply
Some guy's Twitter? Dude, what the heck. Primary sources dude, primary sources: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product
Like this: "It had been typically recognized as two consecutive quarters of economic decline, as reflected by GDP in conjunction with monthly indicators such as a rise in unemployment." (source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/recession.asp)
The good thing about this clip is you can then say: "But your source continues 'However, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), which officially declares recessions, says the two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP are not how it is defined anymore. The NBER defines a recession as a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales'" to which I would say yeah but that's like really long and I just wanted a quick copy and paste, but thank you for reading.
reply
sure, not a primary source. But Walter Bloomberg is as trustworthy as it gets. What are you on about?
reply
What I'm on about is that he isn't a primary source. Even talking heads are not credible if they fail to provide sources. I wouldn't trust a quote from the president even. Why? Because people have a tendancy to start by being truthful, growing an audiance, and then using propaganda to weaponize that audience. Its the reason you'll see lots of maxis say we need to stop with hero worship in our communities, because they will all betray you.
Really whats most important is the fact that Walter Bloomberg did not do the study on GDP, the Bureau of Economic Analysis did which is part of the US department of commerce. Sometimes your source will use "true inflation" adjustments and you can read how they came to a different inflation number and decide for yourself if you agree with that adjustment or if it doesn't make sense at all, because this new non government number then gets used to show different inflation adjusted statistics.
Basically, what I'm on about is to think for yourself.
reply
we need to stop with hero worship in our communities
I agree with that. Bitcoin does not need a Demigod standing on a rock in the ocean when a storm hits and there are dramatic lightning flashes behind him. Shitcoins do that.
Bitcoin dis not need Satoshi. Bitcoin does not need Elon. Bitcoin doesn't need Michael Saylor. Bitcoin does not need Nayib Bukele. Bitcoin needs nobody but the grassroots community.
reply
If we think about a post on SN as a service to everyone, finding the primary source is probably best.
It's kind of like when people post links to links, or links to stories that are retellings of stories that are better told elsewhere. We all want the best source of the information we're consuming - if possible.
reply
Yeah, my original intent was to share the "Life is a Highway" song. Kind of like an unfunny meme. Kind of ""philosophical"" to remind people that they can relax even if we're heading into uncertain times.
reply
@k00b is right - post reputable sources.
"DYOR" and "Don't trust, verify" are staples of this community. Don't be lazy and just rely on word-of-mouth
reply
isn't real GDP (adjusted for inflation) negative from 2008?
reply
Not really but it sure is a lot less impressive if adjusted for inflation: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1/
reply
Im in the global South, we are well in recession here, we've already had 39 days of total powercuts for 2022 alone, we can't even keep the lights on, its getting nuts, and the downstream effects are starting to manifest crime is getting nuts here and people are really angry
reply
Where are you based?
reply
South Africa
reply
I think we are evolving still. Parts of the economy may contract. Most of it, even. Due to the various policies artificially stimulating it over the last couple decades. Boom and bust. But i do believe this time its different, there probably will not be a recovery if you look at the economy with "dollar glasses". Rather new economies are going to grow up that do not use the dollar. And thats not recession in those economies but lets see.
reply
TL;DR: fake news
reply
What's the truth then?
reply
Q1 GDP was -1.6% Q2 numbers not out yet
reply
Are the 2 quarter GDP numbers out already?