@anon
sign up
@anon
sign up
pull down to refresh
0 sats
\
4 replies
\
@kevin
OP
21 Jan
\
parent
\
on: How is Fedimint better than MercuryLayer?
ecash
Can you elaborate? Both are Layer 2 solutions as far as I understand.
write
preview
reply
100 sats
0 sats
hot
recent
top
0 sats
\
3 replies
\
@nicosey
21 Jan
Layer 2s by there definition allows users to always go back on chain. That is what MercuryLayer, Ark and the lightning network allows you to do. Fedimint is shared custody.
reply
0 sats
\
2 replies
\
@kevin
OP
21 Jan
Ok - so how does Fedimint solve custody? You’re still beholden to a third party that can rug you at any point in time
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@nicosey
21 Jan
i would not say it does, its a different trust model.
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@kevin
OP
21 Jan
So no point to Fedimint then? Might as well use Wallet of Satoshi? Or Liquid?
Guess MercuryLayer comes out on top then…
reply